Peter Ackermann v. Gene Shively

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20222:22-cv-08729California815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08729-SPG-RAO Document Filed 12/12/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:22-cv-08729-SPG-RAO PETER ACKERMANN,

Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING ACTION AND

DENYING APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT

WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR GENE SHIVELY; and DOES 1 through COSTS 15 10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Ventura for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND On September 21, 2022, Plaintiff Peter Ackermann, (“Plaintiff”) filed an unlawful detainer action in Ventura County Superior Court against Defendant Gene Shively (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 1 at 6). Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to pay rent and failed to vacate the property after proper notice. (Id. at 7–8). On December 1, 2022, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal, invoking the Court’s federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.