Jerome Daroya v. Mary Josephine Daroya-Lushina

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20222:22-cv-02695California5,822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02695-RSWL-JC Document Filed 12/12/ Page 1 of Page ID #:203

'O' JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CV 22-02695-RSWL-JC x JEROME DAROYA,

Plaintiff, ORDER re: Defendants’ v. Motion to Dismiss [23]

MARY JOSEPHINE DAROYA-

LUSHINA; and DOMINICK

RAMOS,

17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Jerome Daroya (“Plaintiff”) initiated this Action [1] on April 22, 2022, against Defendants Mary Josephine Daroya-Lushina and Dominick Ramos (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff brings a claim against Defendants for violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), along with state law claims for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, constructive trust, and 1 Case 2:22-cv-02695-RSWL-JC Document Filed 12/12/ Page 2 of Page ID #:204

violation of the California Business and Professions

Code. Currently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.