Luz Zendejas v. West Coast Winery, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20222:22-cv-09005California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-09005-SB-AGR Document Filed 12/14/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUZ ZENDEJAS, Case No. 2:22-cv-09005-SB-AGR

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WEST COAST WINERY, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Luz Zendejas, who has nerve damage from multiple sclerosis and requires the use of a wheelchair when traveling in public, filed this suit alleging that she faced barriers to access Defendants’ liquor store, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1. Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to her ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and district courts “can decline to exercise jurisdiction over pendent claims for a number of valid reasons.” City of Chi. v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172 (1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). This discretion is codified in Section 1367(c):…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.