Peter Kleidman v. RFF Family Partnership, LP
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20222:22-cv-03947California273 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-03947-SPG-AFM Document Filed 12/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:134
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 22-03947-SPG(AFMx) Date December 19, 2022
Title Peter Kleidman v. RFF Family Partnership, LP et al
Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK
OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before January 4, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the…