1617 Westcliff LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20228:14-cv-01941California1,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:14-cv-01941-JVS-DFM Document 234 Filed 12/27/ Page 1 of Page ID #:8598

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 1617 WESTCLIFF LLC, Plaintiff, CASE NO: SACV 14-1941 JVS v. (DFMx)

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., etc., et al., FINDINGS OF FACT AND Defendants. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 Case 8:14-cv-01941-JVS-DFM Document 234 Filed 12/27/ Page 2 of Page ID #:8599

This case involves a dispute between plaintiff 1617 Westcliff LLC (“1617 Westcliff”) and Wells Fargo Bank N.A, etc., et al. (collectively “Wells Fargo”) concerning a commercial loan which Well Fargo issued to 1617 Westcliff. The Court now enters its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to 1617 Westcliff’s sole remaining claim for violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 (“Section 17200”). 1617…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.