Mathew

Patrick White v. Mathew

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20222:22-cv-05216California2,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05216-RGK-JEM Document Filed 12/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:110

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ) PATRICK WHITE, ) Case No. CV 22-5216-RGK (JEM) ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. ) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED ) COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND OFFICE DEPOT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

PROCEEDINGS

18 On July 20, 2022, Patrick White (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985(1). On 20 December 19, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). He names the 21 following Defendants: Mathew (John Doe 1), David Russell, Claudia Steckler, and Office 22 Depot. (FAC at 1.)1 23 24 25 26 27 The Court refers to the pages of the Complaint and FAC as numbered by the CM/ECF system. Case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.