Anastasia Martinez v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20232:22-cv-06589California5,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

PLL LLARTNAC LLERRUH

0083 ETIUS ,TEERTS AOREUGIF .S 527 71009 AINROFILAC ,SELEGNA SOL 0002-624 )312( ENOHPELET Case 2:22-cv-06589-DSF-AFM Document Filed 01/09/ Page 1 of Page ID #:264 Thomas C. Hurrell, State Bar No. 119876 E-Mail: thurrell@hurrellcantrall.com Diane Martinez, State Bar No. 276499 E-Mail: dmartinez@hurrellcantrall.com Tasha T. Salveron, State Bar No. 336596 E-Mail: tsalveron@hurrellcantrall.com

HURRELL CANTRALL LLP

725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3800 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 426-2000 Facsimile: (213) 426-2020

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and SHERIFF ALEX

VILLANUEVA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

ANASTASIA MARTINEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-06589-DSF(AFMx)

Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

v. ORDER AND ORDER

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ALEX

VILLANUEVA, CALIFORNIA

COMMERCE CLUB, INC. and DOES Hon. Alexander F. MacKinnon, Crtm. 780 1 through 10,

Defendants.

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.