Melanie Delapaz v. RBD California Restaurants Limited

Case 2:22-cv-01883-DSF-AS Document Filed 01/10/ Page 1 of Page ID #:100

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELANIE DELAPAZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-01883-DSF-AS Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

RBD CALIFORNIA

RESTAURANTS LIMITED, et al, Defendant.

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (Unruh Act), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged pursuant to the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, ‘a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.’” City of Chicago v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997)…