Edmund Edwards v. Krista Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20232:22-cv-08814California472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08814-SB-JC Document Filed 01/12/ Page 1 of Page ID #:103

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDMUND EDWARDS, Case No. 2:22-cv-08814-SB-JC

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND [DKT. NO. 7]

KRISTA EDWARDS AND

CHARISSE EDWARDS,

Defendants.

On December 5, 2022, pro se Plaintiff Edmund Edwards filed a notice of removal of his California Superior Court probate action to administer his father’s estate. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants Krista and Charisse Edwards move to remand the action. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due no later than January 6, 2023. Plaintiff filed no opposition. “The failure to file any required document, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion . . . .” L.R. 7-12.

The federal removal statute, which Plaintiff invokes, provides that unless otherwise prohibited, “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.