The Armand Hammer Foundation, Inc. v. Rex K. Alexander
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-08986-FLA-SK Document Filed 01/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1132
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE ARMAND HAMMER Case No. 2:22-cv-08986-FLA (SKx)
FOUNDATION, INC.,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THE ARMAND HAMMER v. FOUNDATION, INC.’S MOTION TO
REMAND [DKT. 14]
15 DAVE JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 17
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
1 Case 2:22-cv-08986-FLA-SK Document Filed 01/13/ Page 2 of Page ID #:1133
RULING Before the court is Plaintiff The Armand Hammer Foundation, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “AHF”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 14 (“Mot.”). Defendant Rex K. Alexander (“Alexander”) opposes the Motion. Dkt. 25 (“Opp’n”). As of the date of this Order, Defendants Misty Hammer, Mark L. Alfano (“Alfano”), and Bull Canyon, Inc. (“Bull Canyon”) (together with Alexander, “Defendants”) have not appeared in the action or responded to the Motion. For…