Feliciano Coronel v. C. Koenig
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20235:22-cv-01022California279 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD Document Filed 01/17/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1524
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELICIANO CORONEL, Case No. 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING
v.
REPORT AND ADOPTING,
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
C. KOENIG, Warden, OF UNITED STATES Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court accepts the 26 Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. …