Feliciano Coronel v. C. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20235:22-cv-01022California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD Document Filed 01/17/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1524

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELICIANO CORONEL, Case No. 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

v.

REPORT AND ADOPTING,

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

C. KOENIG, Warden, OF UNITED STATES Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court accepts the 26 Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.