LaQuinton D. Bowers, Sr v. James Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20235:22-cv-02072California1,991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-02072-FLA-SK Document Filed 01/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:22-cv-2072-FLA (SK) Date: January 18, 2023 Title LaQuinton D. Bowers v. James Hill et al.

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) SCREENING ORDER1

Plaintiff is a California state prisoner seeking to sue at least six correctional officers from the California Institution for Men (CIM) for more than ten discrete incidents based on an impermissible shotgun complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Jones v. Cmty. Redev. Agency of City of Los Angeles, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984); Jaime v. Parts Auth. LLC, 2021 WL 3055041, at *7 (D. Ariz. July 20, 2021). The Court must screen that complaint to “identify cognizable claims” from deficient ones, including any that are “frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.