Kathy

Anthony Conners v. Kathy

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20232:19-cv-07147California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-07147-JWH-SHK Document 136 Filed 01/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:689

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY CONNERS, Case No. 2:19-cv-07147-JWH-SHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

KATHY, et al., JUDGE Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:19-cv-07147-JWH-SHK Document 136 Filed 01/18/ Page 2 of Page ID #:690

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”) the SAC, Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“MJP”), the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. To the extent that Plaintiff attempts to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.