Peiyun Chen v. Jaddou Ur Mendoza
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-07352-ODW-AFM Document Filed 01/20/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
O
JS-
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 PEIYUN CHEN, Case № 2:22-cv-07352-ODW (AFMx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
v.
MOTION TO DISMISS [9]
14 JADDOU UR MENDOZA et al.,
15 Defendants.
16 Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Susan M. Curda, and Corina Luna move to dismiss 18 Plaintiff Peiyun Chen’s Complaint. (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 9.) 19 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court 20 deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument and vacated the 21 January 23, 2023 hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the reasons 22 that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ unopposed Motion. Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file 24 an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one days prior to the date designated for 25 hearing the motion. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that 26 “[t]he…