United African Asian Abilities Club On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members v. Jimmy C. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20232:23-cv-00437California768 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00437-SB-AGR Document 10 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:87

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED AFRICAN-ASIAN Case No. 2:23-cv-00437-SB-AGR ABILITIES CLUB et al.,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

JIMMY C. LEE et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiffs United African-Asian Abilities Club and its members Anna Marie Wiggins and Robert Aaron McKissick (who has speech and vision disabilities and uses a device for mobility because he is unable to walk) filed this suit alleging that physical and communication barriers at Defendants’ property and website prevent McKissick’s access, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiffs’ Unruh Act claim is closely related to their ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and district courts “can decline to exercise jurisdiction over pendent claims for a number of valid reasons.” City of Chi. v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.