Abdi Mohammed Umar v. T. Justino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20235:22-cv-00427California992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00427-FWS-ADS Document Filed 01/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 5:22-cv-00427-FWS-ADS

ABDI MOHAMMED UMAR, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE [7] v.

T. JUSTINO, ET AL.,

Defendants.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 5:22-cv-00427-FWS-ADS Document Filed 01/23/ Page 2 of Page ID #:

I. Introduction and Relevant Procedural History

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation issued on December 8, 2022 (the “Report and Recommendation”), (Dkt. 7), regarding the civil rights complaint (the “Complaint”) filed by Plaintiff Abdi Mohammed Umar (“Plaintiff”). The Complaint alleges a First Amendment violation by federal officials under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.