Miguel Hernandez v. Vigen Eskandari

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20232:23-cv-00487California856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00487-JLS-PLA Document Filed 01/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:40 ____________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-00487-JLS-PLA Date: January 25, 2023 Title: Miguel Hernandez v. Vigen Eskandari et al

Present: HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

V.R. Vallery N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Act and other state-law claims. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim and other state-law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.