Vidal Coronel v. Mercedes Benz USA LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20235:22-cv-00419California280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00419-JGB-SHK Document Filed 01/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:238

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 22-419 JGB (SHKx) Date January 25, 2023 Title Vidal Coronel v. Mercedes Benz USA LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Failure to Prosecute (IN CHAMBERS) On April 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint against Defendant. (“FAC,” Dkt. No. 13.) On May 12, 2022, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the FAC by not more than 30 days—that is, by June 10, 2022. Defendant has failed to do so. To date, Defendant has not filed a responsive pleading.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) grants the Court authority to sua sponte dismiss actions for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Wolff v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.