Anita Montoya v. AMML Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20235:22-cv-00279California265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00279-JGB-KK Document Filed 01/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 22-279 JGB (KKx) Date January 25, 2023 Title Anita Montoya v. AMML Corporation, et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Failure to Prosecute (IN CHAMBERS) On August 31, 2022, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court set aside the default entered against Defendants. (“Order,” Dkt. No. 19.) The Court ordered Defendants to file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days after the entry of the Order. They have not done so.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) grants the Court authority to sua sponte dismiss actions for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Wolff v. California, 318 F.R.D. 627, 630 (C.D. Cal. 2016). A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.