Daisy Thao Huynh v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20238:22-cv-02046California271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-02046-DOC-JDE Document Filed 01/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:22-cv-02046-DOC-JDE Date: January 31, 2023

Title: DAISY THAO HUYNH ET AL V. NORDSTROM, INC. ET AL.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE

Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Nordstrom”) removed this case from the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on November 9, 2022. Notice of Removal (“Notice”) (Dkt. 1). Defendant argues that the Court has diversity jurisdiction, noting Plaintiff’s Statement of Damages states $3,750,000 in damages incurred due to pain, emotional distress, medical expenses, and future medical expenses. Notice ¶ 6, see also Complaint (Dkt. 1–1) at 6. Plaintiff allegedly suffered these damages when “an improperly maintained and installed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.