Daisy Thao Huynh v. Nordstrom, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20238:22-cv-02046California271 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-02046-DOC-JDE Document Filed 01/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:22-cv-02046-DOC-JDE Date: January 31, 2023
Title: DAISY THAO HUYNH ET AL V. NORDSTROM, INC. ET AL.
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Nordstrom”) removed this case from the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on November 9, 2022. Notice of Removal (“Notice”) (Dkt. 1). Defendant argues that the Court has diversity jurisdiction, noting Plaintiff’s Statement of Damages states $3,750,000 in damages incurred due to pain, emotional distress, medical expenses, and future medical expenses. Notice ¶ 6, see also Complaint (Dkt. 1–1) at 6. Plaintiff allegedly suffered these damages when “an improperly maintained and installed…