Amy N. Barnett v. City of Palm Springs

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20235:21-cv-01965California341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01965-FMO-SP Document Filed 01/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:168

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 21-01965-FMO (Spx) Date January 31, 2023 Title Amy N. Barnett et al v. City of Palm Springs et al

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Gabriela Garcia None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal Pursuant to the Court’s Orders of May 29, 2022 and December 28, 2022, the parties were required to complete a settlement conference before a private mediator no later than January 20, 2023. (See Dkt. 27, Court’s Order of May 29, 2022, at 17); (See Dkt. 32, Court’s Order of December 28, 2022, at 2). If the case settled, the parties were required to file a Notice of Settlement no later than 24 hours after settlement. (See id.). Otherwise, the parties were required to file a Status Report Re: Settlement no later…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.