IH3 Property West, LP v. David Jarrell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20232:23-cv-00685California1,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00685-FMO-MAR Document Filed 02/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-0685 FMO (MARx) Date February 2, 2023 Title IH3 Property West, LP v. David Jarrell

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Gabriela Garcia None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff: Attorney Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Re: Remanding Action On January 30, 2023, defendant David Jarrell (“defendant”), having been sued by IH3 Property West, LP (“plaintiff”) in what appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in California state court, filed a Notice of Removal (“NOR”) of that action on the basis of federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1441. (See Dkt. 1, NOR at 3). “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.