Armin Azod v. James G. Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20232:22-cv-05214California2,161 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are known to the parties. For the purposes of this motion, the following facts are relevant. On July 27, 2022, petitioners Armin Azod, Ramez Elgammal, Shantanu Sharma, Dong Zhang, and Peter John (the “Azod parties’) filed a motion to confirm an arbitration final award against respondents James G. Robinson, Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. (“Morgan Creek”), Cecilia, LLC (“Cecilia”), and Good Stuff, LLC (“Good Stuff’), (collectively, the “Robinson parties”). Dkt. 1. Robinson is the sole owner of Morgan Creek, Cecilia, and Good Stuff. Id. at 5-6. On November 9, 2022, the Court granted the Azod parties’ motion to confirm the arbitration award. Dkt. 56. On November 15, 2022, the Court entered final judgment in favor of the Azod parties and against the Robinson parties, confirming the arbitration final award (the “Final Award”) in all respects. Dkt. 57. Specifically, the final judgment ordered that (1) respondents Cecilia and Good Stuff pay petitioners contract damages in the amount of $905,636, plus preyudgment and post-judgment interest; (2) respondents Robinson, Morgan Creek, Cecilia, and Good Stuff pay petitioners…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.