Cindy Osuna v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20232:22-cv-07960California2,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07960-ODW-PVC Document Filed 02/06/ Page 1 of Page ID #:244

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 CINDY OSUNA, Case № 2:22-cv-07960-ODW (PVCx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v.

REMAND [10]

14 TARGET CORPORATION et al.,

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION On November 1, 2022, Defendant Target Corporation removed this slip-and-fall 19 case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”), 20 ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff Cindy Osuna now moves to remand. (Mot. Remand (“Motion” 21 or “Mot.”), ECF No. 10.) The Motion is fully briefed. (Opp’n, ECF No. 11; Reply, 22 ECF No. 13.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Osuna alleges that, on October 5, 2020, she slipped and fell on blackberries at a 25 Target store in West Covina, California (“Subject Store”). (NOR Ex. A (“Compl.”) 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.