Xinfu Li v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20232:22-cv-08557California243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08557-AB-AFM Document8 Filed 02/07/ Pagelof1 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: CV 22-08557-AB (AFMx) Date: February 7, 2023

Title: Xinfu Li v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 24, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.