Frank Deville v. Tristar Risk Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20232:22-cv-08071California444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08071-JLS-AFM Document Filed 02/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2325 ____________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-08071-JLS-AFM Date: February 07, 2023 Title: Frank Deville v. Tristar Risk Management Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

V.R. Vallery N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, VACATING HEARING

SET FOR FEBRUARY 17, 2023

Plaintiff filed this action on November 4, 2022, asserting claims for breach of contract and bad faith arising out of a workers’ compensation claim, and apparently invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 1332. (See Compl., Doc 1.) “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.