Jonathan Gonzalez v. B. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:21-cv-06316California444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06316-ODW-GJS Document Filed 02/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2577

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN GONZALEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-06316-ODW (GJS)

Petitioner

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

B. CATES, JUDGE Respondent.

16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 11, “Report”], Petitioner’s Objections to the Report [Dkt. 27], and Petitioner’s Motion To Amend Habeas Petition [Dkt. 28, “Motion”]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. A district court has discretion, but is not required, to consider arguments presented for the first time in objections to a report and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.