Laurack D. Bray v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:22-cv-02762California879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02762-SSS-AS Document Filed 02/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:450

1 2

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 LAURACK D. BRAY, Case No. CV 22-2762-SSS (AS) 13 Petitioner, 14 v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al., CONCLUSIONS AND 16 Respondent. RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

21 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner, a misdemeanant convicted in California state court, filed the instant habeas petition (the “Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. [Dkt. 1 at 6, 8-9, 11]. Respondents filed a motion to dismiss, arguing in part that Petitioner’s petition should be dismissed for failure to exhaust his claims in state -1- Case 2:22-cv-02762-SSS-AS Document Filed 02/08/ Page 2 of Page ID #:451

court. [Dkt. 12]. In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate recommended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.