Kingsley Management Corp. v. City of Santa Ana

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20238:23-cv-00102California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:23-cv-00102-CJC-JDE Document Filed 02/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:102

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. SACV 23-00102-CJC (JDEx) Date: February 8, 2023

Title: KINGSLEY MANAGEMENT CORP. ET AL. V. CITY OF SANTA ANA

PRESENT:

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE STAYED

On January 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an action (the “First Action”) against the City of Santa Ana (the “City”) after the City passed two ordinances: a rent control ordinance and a just-cause eviction ordinance (the “First Subject Ordinances”). See Complaint, Kingsley Mgmt. Corp. v. City of Santa Ana, No. SACV 22-00076 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2022), ECF No. 2. Plaintiffs brought six causes of action, claiming that the First Subject Ordinances conflict with various state laws and contain internal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.