Marquise Bailey v. Joung H. Kwon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-05116-JAK-AGR Document Filed 02/09/ Page 1 of Page ID #:149
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUISE BAILEY, No. 2:22-cv-05116-JAK (AGRx)
ORDER RE TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
Plaintiff, SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION
OVER STATE-LAW CLAIMS
v. 14 JOUNG H. KWON; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Case 2:22-cv-05116-JAK-AGR Document Filed 02/09/ Page 2 of Page ID #:150
Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are made: The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other provisions of California law. Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the state-law claims. Dkt. 1 ¶ 7. District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original…