Epson America, Inc. v. Super Times Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20238:23-cv-00218California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:23-cv-00218-KES Document Filed 02/09/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:23-cv-00218-KES Date: February 9, 2023

Title: Epson America, Inc. v. Super Times Co., Ltd., et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT

ATTORNEYS TO APPEAR PRO HAC

VICE SHOULD NOT BE DENIED

UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-2.1.3.2(c).

This Court orders Plaintiff Epson America, Inc. (“Epson”) to show cause why Morgan T. Nickerson’s Application to Appear Pro Hac is not “regularly engaged in business, profession, or other similar activities in California.” Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). On February 6, 2023, Mr. Nickerson applied for permission to appear pro hac vice. (Dkt. 6.) Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c) states: Unless authorized by the Constitution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.