Shaw Tabanfar v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:23-cv-00835California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00835-DMG-JC Document Filed 02/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-835-DMG (JCx) Date February 8, 2023

Title Shaw Tabanfar, et al. v. State Farm General Insurance Company Page 1 of

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

On February 3, 2023, Plaintiffs Shaw and Lina Tabanfar filed a Complaint in this Court asserting claims under California law against Defendants State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm”) and Does 1–25, inclusive. [Doc. # 1.] In the Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that they are “resident[s]” of and domiciled in Los Angeles County and State Farm is “domiciled” in Illinois. Compl. ¶¶ 1–6.

Plaintiffs invoke this Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.