N.T.A.A., Inc. v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Case 2:711-cv-00398-DDP-AGR Document 106 Filed 02/10/ Page1ofi15 Page ID #:2861

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) Case No. 2:21-cv-00398 DDP-AGRx

N.T.A.A. (NO TALK ALL ACTION),

INC.; RYAN ROBINSON, )

) Plaintiffs, )

VS. ORDER DENYING MOTION [83] FOR

NORDSTROM, INC.; NIKE,INC, and) TERMINATING SANCTIONS AND

) Defendants. aC)

NIKE, INC.,

Counterclaimant, ) y ) )

N.T.A.A. (NO TALK ALL ACTION), )

INC.; RYAN ROBINSON, )

Counter-Defendants. ) □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ (SC)

]

Case 2:41-cv-00398-DDP-AGR Document 106 Filed 02/10/ Page 2of15 Page ID #:2862

Presently before the court is Nike’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions (Dkt. 84). 2 || Having considered the parties’ submissions and heard oral argument, the court adopts 3 || the following order. 4] BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Ryan Robinson and No Talk All Action (“NTAA”) assert claims of 6 || Lanham Act trademark infringement and unfair competition, common law trademark 7 ||…