Telzy L. Dennis v. Nike, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20232:22-cv-04515California1,913 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04515-SB-PD Document Filed 02/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:454

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TELZY L. DENNIS, Case No. 2:22-cv-04515-SB-PD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR

FAILING TO TIMELY APPEAR

NIKE, INC., AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

FOR VIOLATIONS OF RULE

Defendant.

Defendant Nike, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Telzy L. Dennis’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC) and noticed the motion for hearing on February 10, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. On February 7, Plaintiff’s counsel, Jose Hernandez, requested to appear remotely. Despite the untimeliness of the request, the Court granted it on February 9 in light of counsel’s family obligations. In the same order, the Court advanced the hearing to 8:00 a.m.:

The Court ADVANCES the hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 57 , to 8:00 a.m. on Friday, February 10, 2023. Plaintiff’s counsel’s request to appear remotely at the hearing is GRANTED. Instructions for remote appearance can be found on Judge Blumenfeld’s webpage.

Dkt. No. 61.1 The order was sent to Mr. Hernandez at the email address he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.