Alfredo Felix v. Eric Arnold

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20235:17-cv-00439California212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:17-cv-00439-JWH-SK Document Filed 02/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:3987

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFREDO FELIX, Case No. 5:17-cv-00439-JWH (SK)

Petitioner, ORDER (1) ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION TO

v.

DENY FIRST AMENDED

ERIC ARNOLD, Warden, PETITION AND (2) DENYING

CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY Case 5:17-cv-00439-JWH-SK Document Filed 02/13/ Page2of2 Page ID #:3988

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to deny the First Amended Petition, any pertinent records, and Petitioner’s objections. None of those objections materially alters or affects the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. The Court therefore concurs with and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation to deny the First Amended Petition. The Court also finds, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Therefore, it is hereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.