Catherine Noonan v. Client Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20232:22-cv-08161California223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08161-FMO-AFM Document Filed 02/14/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CATHERINE NOONAN, ) Case No. CV 22-8161 FMO (AFMx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE CLIENT SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 23, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than March 9, 2023, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.