Isaac Castellanos v. City of Los Angeles

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20232:22-cv-01165California346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01165-ODW-GJS Document Filed 02/15/ Page 1 of Page ID #:352

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 ISAAC CASTELLANOS, Case № 2:22-cv-01165-ODW (GJSx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR v. LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE DOE 15 CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., DEFENDANTS [30]

16 Defendants. 17 18 On February 14, 2023, Plaintiff Isaac Castellanos moved for leave to amend the 20 Complaint to substitute Doe Defendants. (Mot. Leave Amend (“Motion” or “Mot.”), 21 ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff represents that the Motion is unopposed. (Id. at 2.) In 22 addition, the parties stipulated to shorten the notice period on the Motion because 23 Defendants will not file an opposition to the Motion. (Stip. Shorten Notice 24 (“Stipulation”) 2, ECF No. 31.) After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the 26 Court deems the matter appropriate for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.