Bryon Keith Street v. Robert Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20232:18-cv-07734California3,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:18-cv-07734-MEMF-PVC Document Filed 02/15/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2078

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:18-cv-07734-MEMF(PVCx) BRYON KEITH STREET,

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

MODIFYING IN PART MAGISTRATE

v. JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 50] AND

DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF ROBERT NEUSCHMID, HABEAS CORPUS [ECF NO. 1] Respondent.

18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 50),1 and Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 52), Supplemental Objections (ECF No. 55), and Second Supplemental Objections (ECF No. 56) (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Objections”). After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.