Clarence Warren v. J. Gastelo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-03572-DOC-SK Document Filed 02/16/ Page lofi Page ID #:469
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CLARENCE WARREN, Case No. 2:20-ev-3572-DOC (SK) Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
J. GASTELO, ET AL., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to deny Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants have filed no timely objections, so there are no findings in the Report and Recommendation that require de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court accepts the Report and Recommendation as filed and enters the following orders accordingly: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 2. Reference to the assigned Magistrate Judge under General Order 05- 07 is VACATED. All further proceedings shall take place before the undersigned District Judge. 3. This case is REFERRED to the District’s Pro Bono Panel Coordinator for the…