Yinguo Wang v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20232:22-cv-07101California1,378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07101-PA-MRW Document Filed 02/17/ Page 1of3 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-7101 (MRWx) Date February 17, 2023 Title Yinguo Wang v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER On December 27, 2022, the Court ordered plaintiff Yinguo Wang (‘Plaintiff’), who is appearing pro se, to show cause in writing why Plaintiff’s action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution because of Plaintiffs apparent failure to serve the Summons and Complaint within Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)’s 90 day deadline. Plaintiff filed a Response to the Order to Show Cause. Upon receiving that Response, on January 4, 2023, the Court provided Plaintiff with additional time to serve the Government pursuant to Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.