Peter Gakuba v. California Attorney General

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20232:22-cv-09243California1,071 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-09243-FLA-AFM Document Filed 02/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:216

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER GAKUBA, Case No. 2:22-cv-09243-FLA (AFM)

Petitioner,

ORDER SUMMARILY

DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION v.

FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY MATTER JURISDICTION

GENERAL, 16 Respondent. 17 Before the court is Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF 1.) For the following reasons, the petition is summarily dismissed. In 2015, Petitioner was convicted of three counts of aggravated criminal sexual abuse in the Circuit Court of Winnebago County, Illinois. He was sentenced to prison for a term of 12 years. The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed his conviction on March 31, 2017. People v. Gakuba, 2017 IL App (2d) 150744-U. Petitioner’s petition for leave to appeal was denied. People v. Gakuba, 89 N.E.3d 758 (Ill. 2017). (See ECF 1 at 21-22.) In 2017, Petitioner filed a petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.