Madden

Rayon Jones v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20232:22-cv-00446California314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00446-JWH-MAR Document Filed 02/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1134

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYON JONES, Case No. 2:22-cv-0446-JWH (MAR) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

MADDEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondent.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2/22-cv-00446-JWH-MAR Document Filed 02/21/ Page 2of2 Page ID #:1135

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de nove review of those 4 portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court ACCEPTS the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. To the extent that Petitioner argues in the Objections that the prosecution violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), by failing to turn over “all”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.