Jesse Ortiz v. Business Consumers and Housing Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20232:23-cv-00837California1,766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00837-FWS-AS Document Filed 02/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

__________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:23-cv-00837-FWS-AS Date: February 23, 2023 Title: Jesse Ortiz et al. v. Business Consumers and Housing Agency et al.

Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa H. Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT [1]

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Before the court is Plaintiffs Jesse Ortiz, Elizabeth Thomas, and Worktough Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Application to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. 2.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)’s mandatory screening requirement, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, why the Complaint in this action (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.