Manisela V. Prescott v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20232:20-cv-02740California199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-02740-SB-SK Document 111 Filed 02/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:478

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANISELA V. PRESCOTT, Case No. 2:20-cv-2740-SB (SK) Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

et al., PLEADINGS Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation to grant Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and any relevant records as needed. Because the deadline for objections has passed with none filed by either side, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). In any event, based on its review, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation as filed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion be GRANTED as recommended and that Plaintiff’s action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Final…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.