Edward LaCour v. Alex Villanueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20232:22-cv-07645California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07645-DMG-AFM Document Filed 02/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-7645-DMG (AFM) Date February 23, 2023

Title Edward LaCour v. L.A. Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t Page 1 of

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT

BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On December 20, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Because Plaintiff is incarcerated, permission to proceed IFP means that he must still pay the $350 filing fee for this action in installments, including an initial partial filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). In this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), the Court assessed an initial partial filing fee of $20.00, which was due to the Court within 30 days of December 20,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.