Arthur Glenn Jones Sr. v. J. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20232:14-cv-06495California1,791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:14-cv-06495-FLA-AS Document 217 Filed 02/27/ Page 1 of Page ID #:6965

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR GLENN JONES, SR., Case No. 2:14-cv-06495-FLA(AS)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

J. LIZARRAGA, Warden, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the court has reviewed the Petition, all the records herein, and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The court addresses the most pertinent of Petitioner’s Objections, below. /// /// /// Case 2:14-cv-06495-FLA-AS Document 217 Filed 02/27/ Page 2 of Page ID #:6966

1. Any Ambiguity in the Report and Recommendation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.