Megan Reeves v. City of Palm Springs

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20235:22-cv-01910California1,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-01910-SB-MRW Document Filed 02/26/ Page 1 of Page ID #:136

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. ED CV 22-1910 SB (MRW) MEGAN REEVES,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, v.

FRCP

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

et al., Defendants. 19 20 The Court dismisses this action due to Plaintiff’s failure to respond to 21 the defense’s dismissal motions and court orders. 22 * * * 23 1. This is a pro se civil action. Plaintiff’s original complaints1 24 alleged that law enforcement personnel killed Plaintiff’s domestic partner 25 after a car chase. (Docket # 1.) 26 Plaintiff filed two nearly identical actions against numerous local law enforcement agencies and municipalities. The Court consolidated the actions pursuant to Rule 42(a)(2). (Docket # 9.) Case 5:22-cv-01910-SB-MRW Document Filed 02/26/ Page 2 of Page ID #:137

2. Two of the municipal defendants (Cities of Beaumont and Palm Springs) moved to dismiss the action on various grounds. (Docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.