Patricia Rivera v. California Drop Forge, Inc.

Case 2:22-cv-04442-FLA-RAO Document Filed 02/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:248

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICIA RIVERA, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-04442-FLA (RAOx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 16]

CALIFORNIA DROP FORGE, INC.,

15 et al., Defendants.

18 RULING Before the court is Plaintiff Patricia Rivera’s (“Plaintiff” or “Ms. Rivera”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 16. Defendants California Drop Forge, Inc. (“CDF”) and HBD Industries, Inc. (“HBD”) (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the Motion. Dkt. 23 (“Opp’n”). Plaintiff filed a Reply. Dkt. 26 (“Reply”). On August 31, 2022, the court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for September 9, 2022. Dkt. 27; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15. For the reasons stated herein, the court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion. / / /

1 Case…