Rodney Carter v. L. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20238:21-cv-01833California612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:21-cv-01833-JWH-MAR Document Filed 03/06/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2637

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY CARTER, Case No. 8:21-cv-01833-JWH(MAR) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

L. MARTINEZ, Respondent.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 8:21-cv-01833-JWH-MAR Document Filed 03/06/ Page 2 of Page ID #:2638

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court ACCEPTS the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, generally. The Court recognizes that, in the Petition and the Objections, Petitioner raises arguments based on state law, which were not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.