Jonathan Jerozal v. Stryker Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20232:22-cv-04094California5,254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04094-GW-AFM Document 102 Filed 03/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1502

Michele J. Beilke (State Bar No. 194098) mbeilke@HuntonAK.com 2 Kirk A. Hornbeck (State Bar No. 241708) khornbeck@HuntonAK.com

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 Telephone: 213 • 532 • 2000 Facsimile: 213 • 532 • 2020

7 Attorneys for Defendant Stryker Corporation

[Additional Counsel Listed On Next Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN JEROZAL and NIKKI Case No.: 2:22-CV-4094-GW-AFMx GIN, individually and on behalf of all other members of the general public STIPULATED PROTECTIVE similarly situated, ORDER1

17 Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 Complaint Filed: June 14, 2022 STRYKER CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation,

Defendant.

25 26

This Stipulated Protective Order is based substantially on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon’s Procedures.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:22-cv-04094-GW-AFM Document 102 Filed 03/13/ Page 2 of 17 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.